May want to social system define a person’s Education and Identity?
Apart from instruction, I also strongly presume that system does not determine one’s identity. Identity is being who someone is not withstanding their class or level of training. …
Identity is something personal, and it cannot be defined by a person’s culture, the level of training, social course, sex or religion. It is rather the one thing that makes an individual be who they are and stand out as different or unique. Some people may possibly want to detect as poor or underprivileged simply because they belong to the middle or the lower application. These people are wrong because an identity is something bigger than social study course. see here
The people who let their social study class define their identity are misplaced and they must in truth actually seek to better fully understand themselves. In as much as peoples system could change from lower system to upper study course, their identity is something that will not change. This is because a persons identity is something that is inborn. Therefore, people will probably want to never let social platform figure out their schooling or identity but rather strive to be themselves and achieve the best in life irrespective of their social course. When someone understands their detect and achieve the best level of instruction irrespective of their social more
research product, they will in fact be happy. This is because they will be comfortable with who they are and strive to make other people happy as clearly.
Firstly, the government has come up with numerous initiatives that help bright but needy students to gain the highest levels of training and be successful. Examples include the work-study programs. These programs enable students to work, assess and at the same time pay their own school fees. There are also numerous scholarship programs in place to help needy students. The scholarship programs provide a certain amount of money to students who qualify for the criterions stipulated by the scholarships. For this reason, it is incorrect to claim that social training course can define a person’s level of instruction. There have been numerous incidences where students from lower social course have outshined those from the middle and the upperclass etc
to become the best. This, therefore, means that social process can never define a person’s education and learning unless the individual is not aggressive enough to achieve the highest level of education.
Social process is a design of social stratification that has grouped people in a certain hierarchy. The most common social classes are the upper plan, middle model and the lower course. Since time in memorial, the social course had a close relationship with instruction in such a way that people from the upper course receive the best instruction and those from the lower class the worst quality of instruction. This has been facilitated by the constant increase in the cost of training. Most parents from poor communities have not been able to take their children to the best schools. For this reason, bright but poor students have lacked the chance to pursue their education to the highest level due to monetary constraints. This has changed with time, and instruction study class no longer defines one’s schooling.